<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Origins Project. Creativity &amp; Creeds (by Mark Sayers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://originsproject.org/2009/10/the-origins-project-creativity-creeds-by-mark-sayers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://originsproject.org/2009/10/the-origins-project-creativity-creeds-by-mark-sayers/</link>
	<description>The Origins Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 04:03:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The link between Creativity and Creeds &#171; Mark Sayers</title>
		<link>http://originsproject.org/2009/10/the-origins-project-creativity-creeds-by-mark-sayers/comment-page-1/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>The link between Creativity and Creeds &#171; Mark Sayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://originsproject.org/?p=739#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>[...] The link between Creativity and&#160;Creeds By marksayers  I have an article up on the Origins Project site in which I examine the paradoxical link between Creeds and Creativity check it out here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The link between Creativity and&nbsp;Creeds By marksayers  I have an article up on the Origins Project site in which I examine the paradoxical link between Creeds and Creativity check it out here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Matheson</title>
		<link>http://originsproject.org/2009/10/the-origins-project-creativity-creeds-by-mark-sayers/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Matheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://originsproject.org/?p=739#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>I wonder if a key part here is also having an understanding of why each of the rules are there. For instance: a community has a couple of people stuggling with an addiction to alcohol, so together they decide that out of solidarity with their sisters and brothers - nobody in the group will drink. Many generations later the same group still prohibit drinking, though the circumstances for bringing the rule about are no longer there, and no-one is really clear on exactly why they had the rule in the first place. 

Rules are vital, but we absolutely have to consider and reconsider them carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if a key part here is also having an understanding of why each of the rules are there. For instance: a community has a couple of people stuggling with an addiction to alcohol, so together they decide that out of solidarity with their sisters and brothers &#8211; nobody in the group will drink. Many generations later the same group still prohibit drinking, though the circumstances for bringing the rule about are no longer there, and no-one is really clear on exactly why they had the rule in the first place. </p>
<p>Rules are vital, but we absolutely have to consider and reconsider them carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

