A Change Beyond Criticism

eric posted on July 17, 2009

charles Charles Lee is the lead pastor of New Hope, and one of the driving forces behind Idea Camp which is a new way of doing conferences.

In a world where customer  is KING, it’s no wonder that many of us have culturally nurtured an unhealthy perspective of entitlement and voicing complaints. Whether it’s a standard, style, or service, it has become commonplace to feel that we have a right to complain if our expectations are not met.

Unfortunately, the same worldview has clearly permeated much of the Church. In addition, the emergence of new media has given incredible voice and influence to the average person, either for good or you know…

Are many of the complaints warranted? Honestly, I think many complaints about the Church are quite legitimate.

BUT… Please keep a few things in mind as you consider broadcasting complaints about the Church…

  1. Think Change, Not Compensation
    • In a consumer-based culture, the goals of the complainer are often to (1) be heard and acknowledged by those who have wronged them and (2) receive some kind of compensation (usually, more than the fair amount) for the inconvenience or pain experienced. Rarely, if ever, do consumers think of bettering the business or organization that has wronged them during such interactions. As a result, complaint rarely leads to healthy change. It’s really about compensation, not change.
    • For those in the Church, this must NOT be our worldview. Even if we have legitimate complaints about how things may be run or communicated, our goal should NOT end with airing complaints nor seeking compensation. The difference in the Church is that the organization is not suppose to be primarily a “service”-oriented entity in the same way as a product. The center of the organization is NOT us! It’s actually someone named Jesus…or something like that.
    • Over the past 20+ years of being in church leadership, I’ve heard and participated in many movements that accurately pointed out the inadequacies of the Church. Unfortunately, many of these movements, did not provide an embodied alternative for how things could be. Although many paradigms shifted philosophically, most defaulted back to an old methodology and system that created the problems in the first place while others shifted philosophically, but did not possess a workable plan or system.
  2. A Rationalization for Paralysis
    • In my experience, it appears to be that those who often complain the most, whether in a company, church, or organization, have a tendency for using the complaint to rationalize away the energy needed for their participation and problem-solving. Whether it’s the language of burn-out, disconnectedness, new passions, transitions, lack of time or resources, etc., the reality is that it’s easier for us use our dissatisfaction as a reason for paralysis and inactivity than to catalyze change. It’s true, complaining exerts a lot less energy and is more enjoyable than actually doing something about a problem.
    • In the context of the Church, this perspective will result in discouragement for leadership, disunity, confusion, lack of motivation and energy, etc. It’s unfortunate that it only takes a few vocal individuals to drain the life out of a group.
    • Consider that the Church we highlight faults in is still Christ’s Church; a Church he loves, cherishes, and seeks to work in and through.
  3. Difference Between a Freedom of Can and a Freedom of Should
    • I think it’s important in this conversation that we make a clear distinction between the freedom to say what we want and the freedom to say what we ought. Some historians have pointed out that our Constitution’s upholding of freedom of speech was originally instituted to make sure people had freedom to speak what ought to be said. In other words, it implied that freedom was deeply connected with some kind of moral responsibility.
    • In other words, just because we have the freedom and technology to be critical about the inadequacies of the Church, it doesn’t follow from there that we ought to be. Scripture is very clear that in moments of great trials, suffering, or injustice, our tongues can become a great source of evil (James 1-2). We must work towards better reframing our conversations.

If your posture remains humble and open, while our goal focuses on mutual change, we will be far better off as a Church than simply airing our complaints. Don’t you want to be a part of movement that brings change by identifying and embodying how the Church could be rather than what the Church is not?

Filed Under Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comments

5 Comments so far
  1. martin b allen July 29, 2009 7:56 am

    After 35 years of being in church and at times an elder, I have heard a lot of complaining, but to me the church is more beautiful, more important than it has ever been and it is constantly in change and it’s like a diamond with many different parts reflecting light some brighter some not so bright.The master cuts the diamond and he gets more light out of the dull parts.

  2. Brian Day July 29, 2009 8:19 am

    The “customer” mentality is so ingrained in most of us in the church, from pastor/leader to average attender, our biggest challenge may be to free ourselves from it. Our elders are not a board of directors, our pastors are not CEO’s, presidents and vice presidents, our members and attenders are not customers and consumers.
    One approach is churches not owning property, and bi-vocational or non-vocational pastor/leaders. Of course it’s not “wrong” for churches to pay staff and have buildings, but it’s very difficult to escape the traditional business model of leadership/organization when we go down that road…

  3. Charles Lee July 29, 2009 2:39 pm

    Good word Martin.

  4. Eli August 1, 2009 2:23 am

    Hello, Charles,

    I understand the meaning of what you have touched upon. And through my own experience, I can’t say more good has come out than evil from any churches I’ve been. Churches are not perfect, I acknowledge. Mistakes, everyone does.

    But I suppose, I want to know, is… what happens when one person can see the flaws of the church, and everyone else acts like there isn’t? Is that vision given from God, or that person is just imagining things?

    What is one person ought to do, in a small community church, and sees ignorance and unopeness memebers mundanely accept?

    Critism isn’t what I want to get at but what is the meaning to see and acknowledge and know that these things exist in a churches? What is the meaning to have seen it, known it, reflected at it? What is the point of one person seeing all this?

    Part of the solution would be to join the church?
    Part of the solution would be to rise the issues with some church memebers?
    Part of the solution would be not do anything about it?
    part of the solution can go on and on and on…

    Community… um.
    What can one do?

  5. Charles Lee August 1, 2009 9:35 pm

    Well said Brian… As some have pointed out, consumption or consumerism may be one the most detrimental realities for the Church. I think we might need to rethink some of our practices, ethos, and language. Do you have any suggestions?

    Thanks for your note Eli. There’s no doubt that God could communicate to single individuals about the state of the rest of his/her community. We see some of this reflected in the insights received by prophets and apostles in Scripture. How and when to share something, if it is indeed from God, appears to have been fairly clear to those who received such words.

    I think there are a couple of things to consider when you feel you have such insight:

    1. Is the thought consistent with God’s word and nature?
    2. Are there others outside of your church who can better understand what you’re sensing? If so, can they help you think through your context? Since it sounds like your goal is to edify the church, taking this extra step to explore your thoughts with like-minded people may be beneficial. I’m praying that you have such people.
    3. Is the church even open to considering your voice? Do you have relational equity with your community? For some, the obstacle is not even the message but the messenger. Does your life consistently with what you hope to communicate? Does your life embody the message?

    These are just some of my initial thoughts.